Monday, January 30, 2023

Court of Appeals terms Unexpected Man’s Arrest Despite No Arrest Order

- Advertisement -

The man was later taken into custody in connection with an alleged cheating case in Maharashtra, and the Supreme Court on Monday referred. It as “surprising” and “strange” that the police had obtained a non-bailable warrant (NBW) against him despite a specific interim order from the top court that he not be arrested.

If not required in any other instance, the Supreme Court ordered that the petitioner be released today and that the compliance be reported without fail during the same day. t is somewhat interesting to note that in spite of a particular temporary injunction issued by this court directing that the petitioner not be detained in relation to the FIR… The petitioner was served with non-bailable warrants by the prosecution, and when the petitioner appeared in court. The judicial magistrate first class noted, in an order dated June 24, 2022. That the interim protection from arrest ended six weeks after the ruling of this court.

- Advertisement -

The petitioner had brought up his arrest in an application to the top court, asking for an order directing his release.

Regarding the returnable date of the notification given by the Supreme Court in its order from May 7 of last year, the bench observed that the six-week window appears to have been “stolen.”

- Advertisement -

The bench stated, “If what has been observed by the magistrate in the order dated June 24, 2022, is the only reason for the detention of the petitioner in judicial custody. The bona fides of the prosecuting agency and the magistrate’s understanding of the operation of this court’s order become the matters of serious concern.”

The subject was then scheduled for another hearing on July 7. With the statement, “However, at this time we are not making any other comment in the matter and permit counsel for the state some time to file a response to this application.”

The bench further ordered that a copy of its order is sent to the state’s attorney for prompt and suitable directions and that it be sent by mail to the magistrate.

The bench voiced its concern during the hearing regarding. How the prosecution agency acquired the NBW and how the magistrate issued the order.

It crosses the restrictions of astonishing and stunning additionally. The seat orally noticed, adding, “We need to teach our justice moreover.” “It questions your true blue too. How do you get a non-bailable warrant?” the seat told the legal counselor showing up for the state.

The top court saw that the detainment of the solicitor is straightforwardly. In opposition to and in the rebellion with the top court’s organization.

The candidate had last year recorded a request in the Supreme Court against a request passed by the Bombay High Court dismissing his request looking for expectant bail for a situation enrolled for the supposed offenses, including cheating. Under the Indian Penal Code.

On May 7 last year, the top court, while hearing his supplication, passed a request. Which said: “Issue notice, returnable in about a month and a half. The candidate is at freedom to serve the standing guidance for the province of Maharashtra. Meanwhile, the solicitor will not be captured regarding FIR… “

- Advertisement -

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected


Latest Articles